October 8, 2021Open Access

Differences in finished case quality between Invisalign and traditional fixed appliances:

ELEric Cheng-Huang LinUniversity of Dallas KJKatie JulienTexas A&M Health Science Center MKMatthew J. KesterkeTexas A&M University System

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

While patients with simple malocclusions require 4.8 months longer treatment times with aligners than traditional braces, the treatment and 6-month posttreatment occlusal outcomes are similar.

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Lin et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db232b7a67537a8ba3d047 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2319/032921-246.1

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1The ABO discrepancy index: a measure of case complexity2004 · 190 citations
2Northcroft Lecture: How has the spectrum of orthodontics changed over the past decades?2011 · 62 citations
3Long-term posttreatment changes measured by the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system2005 · 79 citations
4Changes in mandibular incisor position and arch form resulting from Invisalign correction of the crowded dentition treated nonextraction2015 · 52 citations
5Periodontal health in teenagers treated with removable aligners and fixed orthodontic appliances2015 · 162 citations

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo