Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
In this paper, semantic segmentation networks such as UNet and DeepLabV3+ are evaluated and compared against Random Forest and Support Vector Machines in the field of step-heating active infrared thermography for subsurface defect detection and localization. To collect information from an entire digital recording sequence into a particular image, post-processing methods such as PCT, PPT, Kurtosis, Skewness and TSR are used. Two datasets are created, one with 3-channel images using PCT, and one using all the above post-processing methods to condense the heating and cooling processes into 30-channel images. This evaluation study shows that DeepLabV3+ is able to detect most defects in specimens with a similar structure to training samples without false positives even for defects of different depth and area. UNet requires the use of 30-channel images to achieve results closer to DeepLabV3+. Random Forest and Support Vector Machines are unable to compete with the recent methods as they are unable to detect defects correctly.
Pedrayes et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: