Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
In this article we examine what we call the president's invisible appointments. We designate S enior E xecutive S ervice and S chedule C appointees as invisible because, in lieu of a scandal, these appointees serve in the bureaucracy, generally with significantly less direct attention from the press or scholars. In addressing the invisible appointees, we use new data from an ongoing research project that collects and codes data from the résumés of political appointees in the G eorge W . B ush and B arack O bama administrations. In this article we examine data from the résumés of appointees serving in the Department of L abor during these two administrations. We describe the characteristics presidents consider when making appointments, explain which factors are most important for which positions, and compare the results to existing expectations about the factors presidents consider when making appointments.
Lewis et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: