Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Sharpening our approaches to methodology in self-study research can strengthen our work and clarify questions that arise for readers unfamiliar with this research genre. Our article considers three methodologies – narrative, auto-ethnography and self-study – that privilege self in the research design, believing that addressing self can contribute to our understandings about teaching and teacher education. We address two questions: In what ways, if any, does the methodological choice affect the inquiry of the researchers? When, if ever, might self-study be the best choice for inquiry? For this, we use one selected work to explore the critical elements of these methodologies to determine usefulness. This is not a discussion to determine which approach is better; rather it is a discussion to explore when one method might be privileged over another and why.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hamilton et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbeeedc34c3c3eb468429a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17425960801976321
Mary Lynn Hamilton
Pearson (United States)
Laura Mazzoli Smith
Durham University
Kristen Worthington
University of Kansas
Studying Teacher Education
University of Kansas
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: