July 6, 2018Open Access

Analysis of Errors in Dictated Clinical Documents Assisted by Speech Recognition Software and Professional Transcriptionists

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

Seven in 100 words in SR-generated documents contain errors; many errors involve clinical information. That most errors are corrected before notes are signed demonstrates the importance of manual review, quality assurance, and auditing.

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dcd1694006ebb8efe52fb8 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0530

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Evaluation of VoiceType Dictation for Windows for the radiologist.1997 · 7 citations
2Clinical governance and clinical documentation: still a long way to go?2000 · 19 citations
3Comparison of accuracy of physical examination findings in initial progress notes between paper charts and a newly implemented electronic health record2016 · 54 citations
4Initial evaluation of a continuous speech recognition program for radiology2001 · 32 citations
5Untitled1996 · 5 citations

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo