The author comments on Fornell and Larcker's article in the February 1981 issue of JMR. He indicates some limitations of the analyses, pinpoints where they can be misleading, and introduces some new notions.

Me gusta

Guardar

Me gusta

Guardar

Cite This Study

Richard P. Bagozzi (Sat,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd39c57808b00a4799b8ca https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800312

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Causal Models in Marketing1981 · 459 citations
2Multivariate Analysis with Latent Variables: Causal Modeling1980 · 1,622 citations
3Canonical Correlation Analysis As A Special Case Of A Structural Relations Model1981 · 208 citations
4Systems under indirect observation : causality, structure, prediction1982 · 854 citations
5Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error1981 · 67,592 citations

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Causal Models in Marketing1981 · 459 citations
2Multivariate Analysis with Latent Variables: Causal Modeling1980 · 1,622 citations
3Canonical Correlation Analysis As A Special Case Of A Structural Relations Model1981 · 208 citations
4Systems under indirect observation : causality, structure, prediction1982 · 854 citations
5Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error1981 · 67,592 citations