Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
There is a requirement for accredited laboratories to participate in external quality assessment (EQA) schemes, but there is wide variation in understanding as to what is required by the laboratories and scheme providers in fulfilling this. This is not helped by a diversity of language used in connection with EQA; Proficiency testing (PT), EQA schemes, and EQA programmes, each of which have different meanings and offerings in the context of improving laboratory quality. We examine these differences, and identify what factors are important in supporting quality within a clinical laboratory and what should influence the choice of EQA programme. Equally as important is how EQA samples are handled within the laboratory, and how the information provided by the EQA programme is used. EQA programmes are a key element of a laboratory's quality assurance framework, but laboratories should have an understanding of what their EQA programmes are capable of demonstrating, how they should be used within the laboratory, and how they support quality. EQA providers should be clear as to what type of programme they provide - PT, EQA Scheme or EQA Programme.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David G. James
Washington State University
Darren C. Ames
DNAnexus (United States)
Berenice Lopez
Boehringer Ingelheim (Mexico)
Journal of Clinical Pathology
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Ipswich Hospital
Swansea Bay University Health Board
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
James et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd4e5b7808b00a4799c83c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201621
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: