Newcastle City Council and the grassroots: accountability and budgeting under austerity

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to shed light on new accountability relationships between City Council (NCC) and its citizens and stakeholders in the wake of the British government’s politics and its budget cuts for local authorities. It seeks to show some of the ways in which kinds of budgeting, for example, for alternative sources of funding, the use of volunteers for provision, resource sharing, and asset transfers, as well as a diverse set of accounts of the social of resource diversions and service cuts, have been implicated in those changes. /methodology/approach – The authors conducted a qualitative field study of some of the of budgets in the shaping of accountability relationships through interviews with council officers, with activists and citizens, analysis of council and other documents, and observation of meetings and demonstrations. The approach focused on the relationship between the city’s grassroots and the NCC leadership and administration. – The authors find that NCC’s senior politicians and officers co-opted the city’s political and managed to reconstitute local political accountability to citizenry and stakeholders as a between the cessation of different types of local government services, by combining appeals to legal framework of English local authorities, the unfairness of national politics, and the fairness of government service provision. Local government blamed the funding cuts and the resulting shortages on the central government. It sought to push responsibility for cuts to the local whilst reserving for itself the role of mediator and adjudicator who makes the final decisions the portfolio of causes that will be funded. /value – This is the first study to offer detailed insight into the effects of the British ’s austerity budget cuts of local authority grants on the politics of accountability in a local.