March 1, 2007

Failure Mechanisms After Unicompartmental and Tricompartmental Primary Knee Replacement with Cement

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

The survival of cemented unicompartmental knee replacements is inferior to that of cemented tricompartmental total knee replacements in all age-categories.

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Cite This Study

Furnes et al. (Thu,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df0c82b8d7e9456661433a https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.f.00210

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1RAPID POLYETHYLENE FAILURE OF UNICONDYLAR TIBIAL COMPONENTS STERILIZED WITH GAMMA IRRADIATION IN AIR AND IMPLANTED AFTER A LONG SHELF LIFE2002 · 89 citations
2A five to seven-year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty.1980 · 355 citations
3Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study.1991 · 393 citations
4A Comparison of Tricompartmental and Unicompartmental Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Gonarthrosis1991 · 229 citations
5A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time1996 · 2,547 citations

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar