January 1, 2022Open Access

Cephalomedullary Nailing versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation in Basicervical Femoral Neck Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

Stable fixation using DHS and CMN does not show a significant clinical or radiographical difference in BFNF, and the implant can be selected based on the surgeon's preference.

Leer artículo completoexternamente

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Yoon et al. (Sat,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df44346324afb55d591e5c https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.63.8.744

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Review on Basicervical Femoral Neck Fracture: Definition, Treatments, and Failures2020 · 41 citations
2Treatment of basicervical femoral neck fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation2019 · 28 citations
3Análise comparativa do tratamento de fraturas basocervicais de fêmur com CCS, DHS e PFN em adultos jovens2018 · 12 citations
4Hip fractures in the elderly: A world-wide projection1992 · 3,163 citations
5Biomechanical rationale for implant choices in femoral neck fracture fixation in the non-elderly2015 · 164 citations

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo