Background: Variability in procedural exposure among internal medicine junior doctors may result in inconsistent preparedness for essential bedside procedures. Simulation-based education grounded in mastery learning has been proposed to standardise skill acquisition, but less is known about how such training is integrated into clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a theory-informed mixed-methods evaluation of a mastery-oriented procedural simulation workshop. The quantitative component used pre–post assessments, including a multiple-choice knowledge test and self-reported measures of perceived knowledge, skill, and confidence using a 5-point Likert scale. Participants were required to achieve predefined competency benchmarks based on ACGME-aligned procedural checklists. The qualitative component, conducted two years later, involved semi-structured interviews exploring how participants integrated workshop learning into clinical practice. Results: Thirty-eight participants completed paired pre–post assessments. Knowledge scores and self-reported perceived knowledge, skill, and confidence improved significantly across all procedures (p < 0.01), with large effect sizes. Ten participants participated in follow-up interviews. Thematic analysis identified four themes: (1) standardization of procedural practice, (2) activation of prior knowledge, (3) hands-on experience and skill development, and (4) relevance to clinical practice. Conclusions: A mastery-oriented simulation workshop was associated with improvements in knowledge and perceived procedural readiness. Structured simulation may influence how junior doctors approach procedural learning in clinical practice.
Lee et al. (Wed,) studied this question.