IoT-based smart greenhouse sensing, real-time signal conditioning and abnormality detection are still predominantly executed at gateway or cloud levels, limiting responsiveness and increasing vulnerability to noise-induced false alarms. This study proposes and experimentally validates a mobile-edge signal processing and abnormality detection framework executed entirely within an Android-based smartphone application, eliminating dependence on continuous cloud-side analytics. Environmental data from 27 wireless sensor nodes measuring temperature, relative humidity, CO2 concentration, and light intensity were processed in real time using a sliding-window moving-average filter (N = 6) implemented with O(1) computational complexity. Abnormal conditions were determined via thresholding combined with temporal majority voting validation to suppress transient violations. Performance was also evaluated with direct threshold-based detection on raw signals to assess the effect of mobile-side filtering and temporal majority validation on abnormal sample counts, event fragmentation, and detection consistency. Mobile application side signal conditioning reduced short-term variance by 35–55% while maintaining an effective delay below two sampling intervals. Event-level analysis demonstrated substantial consolidation of noise-induced detections, reducing abnormal event frequency by up to 69% and increasing median event duration from 5 to 38 min for temperature, with negligible detection bias (±1.1%). End-to-end processing latency remained bounded under sustained multi-node streaming, with median delays of 1.0–1.6 s and 95th-percentile delays below 4.0 s. These results demonstrate that lightweight mobile-edge signal conditioning can significantly enhance detection robust-ness, reduce false alarms, and achieve low-latency environmental monitoring in green-houses. The proposed framework provides scalable and computationally efficient architecture for real-time abnormality detection in precision agriculture systems.
Bicamumakuba et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: