ABSTRACT Drug combinations, where two drugs are co‐administered, are being explored widely within Phase I trials in oncology. These trials aim to identify the maximum tolerated dose combination (MTDC) by adapting the dose of both treatments based on current trial data. Various methods have been proposed to inform how escalation decisions are made within a trial. We propose a model‐based design which aims to adapt the dose combination that participants receive to a level that maximises the information gained from each move across the toxicity surface, subject to admissibility and escalation constraints (penalised D‐Optimality strategy). We simulated multiple different scenarios, and the penalised D‐Optimality strategy is shown to have similar operating characteristics to the Interval approach, which is widely used within Phase I oncology trials. Furthermore, the penalised D‐Optimality strategy shows further exploration across the toxicity surface, providing the potential to identify multiple MTDCs, further characterise the risk–benefit profile and provide flexibility for dose selection in future trials. We also show how priors of the two drugs can be specified to show a favoured escalation route if pre‐clinical data suggests this.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ajimi et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69e713b4cb99343efc98d2ab — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70071
Maxine Ajimi
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Benjamin Webb
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Graham M. Wheeler
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
Pharmaceutical Statistics
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: