Economic, ethical, and environmental sustainability of cardiac imaging

Current cardiology guidelines assign a class of recommendation 1 for the diagnosis of chest pain to five imaging techniques based on either anatomic (coronary computed tomography angiography) or functional approaches, such as stress single-photon emission tomography, stress positron emission tomography, stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and stress echocardiography. The choice is left to the prescribing physician, based on local availability and expertise. However, the five techniques differ substantially in their cost, applicability based on patient characteristics, long-term risk, and environmental impact. The average European immediate cost ranges from 50 to 1000 euros. The radiation exposure ranges from 0 to 500 chest x-rays. The environmental footprint ranges from 3 to 300 kg of carbon dioxide emissions equivalent. The ethical code of the World Medical Association 2021 recommends the responsible use of healthcare money by doctors, with the minimization of potential damage to patients and the environment. The Euratom law 2013/directive 59 reinforces the justification principle and the optimization principle for medical radiation exposures, with the legal responsibility of both the referrer and the practitioner. A small cost, a minimal long-term risk, and a modest carbon emission per examination multiplied by billions of tests per year become an unaffordable economic burden in the short-term, significant population damage to public health over the years, and impacts on climate change in decades. The cardiology community may wish to adopt a more sustainable practice with affordable, radiation-optimized, and carbon-neutral practices for the benefit of patients, physicians, payers, and the planet.