Transboundary river basins (TRBs) sustain billions of livelihoods, yet they face enduring systemic challenges of cooperative water governance. Although collaborative governance models consistently yield acceptable outcomes, adversarial dynamics and zero-sum approaches continue to dominate transboundary water management. This systematic review synthesizes the peer-reviewed literature (2000–2026) to evaluate how four major governance dimensions—and the cross-cutting integration of the water–energy–food (WEF) nexus—shape the effectiveness of water diplomacy in international basins. Socio-economic analysis reveals that benefit-sharing arrangements grounded in joint investment outperform zero-sum volumetric allocation, though implementation remains constrained by institutional fragmentation and governance lock-in. Power relations analysis demonstrates that material, institutional, knowledge-based, and narrative-framing asymmetries systematically define the range of achievable agreements and the reliability of cooperative commitments, with case analysis from the Nile, Mekong, Tigris–Euphrates, and Central Asian basins showing that comparable hydrological conditions yield divergent diplomatic outcomes depending on how power is distributed. Stakeholder engagement findings indicate that formal participatory mechanisms frequently produce symbolic rather than substantive inclusion, particularly where structural imbalances limit procedural access. Gender analysis provides that women’s inclusion improves agricultural productivity, water-use efficiency, and adaptive capacity—functioning as a governance variable with measurable system-performance effects rather than solely an equity objective. The WEF nexus operates as the integrative mechanism binding these dimensions, reframing diplomacy from volumetric allocation toward adaptive benefit arrangements that coordinate interdependent services across sectors. This review concludes that effective transboundary governance emerges from the concurrent integration of socio-economic benefit-sharing, power-responsive institutions, meaningful stakeholder participation, gender equity, and nexus-based coordination in global TRBs.
KHAJAVIGODELLOU et al. (Mon,) studied this question.