This study re-examines the developmental promise of financial liberalization in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), a region characterized by institutional fragility and oil dependence. Using panel data from 11 MENA countries over the period 2004–2020, we construct a composite financial development index and estimate its determinants through fixed-effects regressions with robust Driscoll-Kraay standard errors. The results show that investment freedom significantly reduces financial development (β = -0.0191, p < 0.000). Importantly, the interaction between investment freedom and rule of law is also negative and significant (β = -0.0067, p = 0.0008), suggesting that even in countries with relatively stronger legal institutions – such as the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia – liberalization may enhance elite capture rather than broaden inclusion. In contrast, financial freedom has a positive and significant effect (β = 0.0107, p = 0.002). Financial globalization, whether measured by total capital flows (β = 0.0347, p = 0.122) or by foreign direct investment (β = -0.0054, p = 0.488), shows no statistically significant effect. These findings challenge the assumption that openness automatically enhances financial progress. Instead, it is acknowledged that in rentier and post-authoritarian contexts, institutional preconditions must precede liberalization. Without credible governance, financial openness risks deepening exclusion and systemic fragility rather than providing inclusive growth.
Ansari et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: