Does echocardiographic wall motion analysis using a nine-segment model accurately estimate LVEF compared to radionuclide and contrast ventriculography in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
A simple nine-segment echocardiographic wall motion analysis provides accurate estimates of LVEF comparable to radionuclide and contrast ventriculography in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Echocardiographic estimates of left ventricular ejection fraction (ECHO-LVEF) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were obtained by a new approach, using visual analysis of left ventricular wall motion in a nine-segment model. The method was validated in 41 patients using radionuclide ventriculography (RNV) and contrast ventriculography measurements of LVEF for comparison. ECHO-LVEF from the 41 patients correlated well with the reference methods (y = 1.5x - 14.7, r = 0.93; linear regression analysis; 95% confidence limit for a single determination of ECHO-LVEF was 17.2). Interobserver variability by linear regression was r = 0.89, SEE = 7.1 with a mean difference between paired observations of -1.5 +/- 6.9 (SD). In a random sample of 18 patients (45 observations), ECHO-LVEF allowed separation between RNV-LVEF values greater than or equal to 40 and less than 40, representing low and high risk groups following AMI. Thus, the results showed that simple, readily available wall motion-derived estimates of LVEF were as closely associated with LVEF measured by standard reference methods as were previously published, more cumbersome, planimetric echocardiographic methods. Reporting on global LVEF function in LVEF units rather than in nonstandardized wall motion scores of index values may facilitate intra- and interhospital communication and the use of optimized echocardiographic risk stratification after AMI.
Berning et al. (Wed,) studied this question.