This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Yaniv Riz’s Unified Informational Theory: Time, Force, Gauge Structure, Matter, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines Riz’s informational ontology—centered on distinguishability, potential information, distinguished information, dispersed information, thermodynamic registration, phase-time, gauge structure, toroidal matter, and informational cosmology—in confrontation with the modal axioms of TO. The analysis emphasizes possible compatibilities between Riz’s framework and the TO thesis that there is no existential universe without a substance transcendent to its quantum. In TO, this transcendent element is understood as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiation. The article also identifies tensions between UIT and TO, especially regarding the absence, in Riz’s framework, of Nothing as a primitive and eternal mathematical essence, the lack of explicit modal necessity, and the speculative character of some extensions toward weak interaction, strong interaction, toroidal matter, dark matter, and cosmology. The paper further articulates Riz’s proposal with the phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity. It also examines the empirical test suggested in Riz’s article—driven coherent transport above the critical temperature—as a possible operational bridge for future dialogue with TO, especially concerning radiation, coherence, information, and atomic relations. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Unified Informational Theory; Yaniv Riz; informational ontology; modal axioms; atomic radiation; transcendent substance; thermodynamic time; phase-time; gauge structure; cosmology; Inducer Effects; phenomenic elements; coherent transport; ChatGPT.
Cabannas et al. (2026) studied this question.