CJM Manifesto 1/3 introduces the LC Structural Alignment Pilot v0.05-beta, a low-cost, crowd-sourced experimental artifact for translating structural mathematics into reproducible physical observation. This release is not presented as a conventional research paper, nor does it claim to solve P vs NP or validate CJM in its final form. Instead, it proposes a narrow Stage-0 experimental question: can a simple 3SAT-derived symbolic structure produce reproducible alignment-like physical responses in an LC resonance system? The pilot uses a low-cost circuit configuration based on a microcontroller-compatible signal source, a 100 µH inductor, a 0.1 µF capacitor, a protection resistor, a breadboard, and a two-channel oscilloscope. The nominal LC resonance is approximately 50.3 kHz. Because common default PWM frequencies are usually too low for this LC pair, the release includes an Arduino Timer1 serial-control sketch and a Python USB trial runner that sends assignment-labeled target frequencies near resonance and exports a CSV submission template. The included toy 3SAT example is not intended to demonstrate computational advantage or solve 3SAT physically. It is used only as a simple, repeatable symbolic trial schedule for testing whether the LC-CJM setup can produce observable, reproducible alignment-like responses under controlled conditions. The experiment should therefore be understood as an operational reproducibility test, not as a benchmark of computational superiority. The atemporal focus of CJM is central to this release. CJM is not introduced here as another digital calculator or ordinary analog optimizer. Rather, it asks whether an encoded structure may already contain its admissible True/False condition before sequential search is performed, and whether a resonant physical system can witness that condition through alignment-like response. This Zenodo release includes the manifesto-style technical note, wiring diagram, Arduino sketch, Python trial runner, CSV-oriented submission workflow, and replication report form. Positive, negative, uncertain, and artifact-related observations are all welcome, provided that circuit conditions, oscilloscope settings, screenshots, waveform files, and notes are clearly recorded.
YOON KEUNSOO (Tue,) studied this question.