Virtual reality (VR) rehabilitation demonstrates high patient satisfaction in hospital settings, yet implementation in home-based telerehabilitation remains unexplored in Czechia. Understanding patient attitudes toward VR telerehabilitation is crucial for developing feasible post-discharge rehabilitation programs. To assess patient attitudes toward actual VR telerehabilitation implementation following positive hospital-based VR rehabilitation experience in subacute stroke patients. A telephone-based follow-up study was conducted among patients who previously participated in VR rehabilitation during subacute stroke hospitalization at University Hospital Ostrava. Participants completed a structured interview assessing overall VR rehabilitation satisfaction, interest in home-based VR telerehabilitation with actual equipment provision, confidence in remote physiotherapist supervision, family support availability, perceived barriers, and open-ended feedback. Non-response bias was assessed through baseline characteristics comparison and sensitivity analyses. Ten patients from the original cohort of 19 participants completed telephone interviews (response rate 52.6%). High satisfaction with hospital-based VR rehabilitation was reported by 90% of participants. Interest in home-based VR telerehabilitation was expressed by 70% of patients (95% CI 41.6–98.4%), with 50% (95% CI 19.0–81.0%) reporting confidence in remote physiotherapist supervision. Family support was available for 80% of participants (95% CI 55.2–100%). Sensitivity analysis suggests true population interest ranges from 36.8 to 84.2%, with baseline-weighted estimate of 57.9%. Patient attitudes toward VR telerehabilitation were generally positive despite moderate confidence in remote supervision. Real-world implementation should anticipate mid-range acceptance (≈ 40–60%) and explicitly address enabling conditions for safety, technical support, and caregiver involvement, aligning with recent telemedicine adoption evidence and home-VR feasibility gaps.
Najsrová et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: