Oligometastatic cancer is characterised by a low volume of metastases to a small number of anatomical sites. However, evaluating the impact of metastases-directed therapies (MDTs) on overall survival or quality of life is often challenging. Current clinical trials use a wide range of primary endpoints that might not be validated or suited to MDT. To address this issue, we did a systematic review of international trial registries, alongside a Delphi consensus process involving 30 experts and five patient representatives. The aim was to identify preferred primary endpoints for MDT trials in oligometastatic disease, regardless of tumour type. Overall survival and progression-free survival were the most frequently used endpoints across the 121 comparative trials reviewed. Over four Delphi consensus rounds, overall survival had the highest level of agreement, although its limitations as a sole endpoint were emphasised. In addition to the widely used progression-free survival endpoint, polymetastatic progression-free survival and start-or-switch of systemic therapy-free survival also reached consensus, particularly for trials integrating systemic therapies. Both polymetastatic progression-free survival and systemic therapy-free survival permit repeat MDT without classifying it as treatment failure. Patient representatives highlighted the importance of time-to-deterioration of quality of life. This consensus supports overall survival as a primary endpoint and, in addition to progression-free survival, recommends polymetastatic progression-free survival and systemic therapy-free survival, especially in combination with systemic therapies. Adopting these endpoints will make MDT trials more relevant, comparable, and patient-centred, thereby empowering future clinical and policy decisions.
Widder et al. (Fri,) studied this question.