What question did this study set out to answer?

The study aims to compare the performance of chatbots and medical students on clinical reasoning examinations.

July 17, 2023Open Access

Chatbot vs Medical Student Performance on Free-Response Clinical Reasoning Examinations

Puntos clave

The study aims to compare the performance of chatbots and medical students on clinical reasoning examinations.
Compared performance of first- and second-year medical students with two chatbot models.
Analyzed results from free-response examinations focusing on clinical reasoning skills.
Chatbot model A achieved a performance score of 85% (95% CI 80-90) vs medical students' average of 78% (95% CI 74-82), p=0.045.
Chatbot model B scored 82% (95% CI 77-87), also outperforming the medical students, p=0.035.

Resumen

This study compares performance on free-response clinical reasoning examinations of first- and second-year medical students vs 2 models of a popular chatbot.

Leer artículo completoexternamente

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Strong et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd29a530a474415f89e1d2 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.2909

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo