Transcranial Doppler ultrasound demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (94% vs 50%, p=0.039) than transthoracic echocardiogram for detecting right-to-left shunts relative to TEE.
Observational (n=92)
No
Does transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) improve sensitivity for right-to-left shunt detection compared to transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) in patients with ischemic stroke or TIA?
92 patients undergoing transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detection, mean age 52.66 ± 15.78 years, 51% female, with qualifying events including ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.
Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD)
Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and cardiac computed tomography (CCT), with transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) as the gold standard reference
Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detectionsurrogate
Transcranial Doppler ultrasound offers high sensitivity for detecting right-to-left shunts in stroke/TIA patients, making it a valuable non-invasive screening tool compared to TTE.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 94% vs 50%
valor p: p=0.039
Abstract Background and aims Patient foramen ovale (PFO) is a stroke risk factor evaluated using transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD), and cardiac computed tomography (CCT). TCD is non-invasive, but its diagnostic performance relative to other modalities is unclear. We hypothesized that TCD has high sensitivity but low specificity for PFO detection. Methods We conducted an IRB-approved, single-center retrospective study of patients undergoing TCD for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detection between January 2024 and April 2025. Patients were identified from the Neurosonology Laboratory Quality Database. Records were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, and TTE, TEE, and CCT findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for TCD, TTE, and CCT relative to TEE, the gold standard. The sensitivity and specificity of TCD versus TTE were compared using McNemar test. Results Ninety-two patients were included. Mean age was 52.66 ± 15.78 years, and 51% were female; qualifying events included ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. RLS was detected in 53 patients (57.6%) by TCD, 17 (30%) by TTE, 18 (28.5%) by TEE, and 3 (21%) by CCT. TCD demonstrated 94% sensitivity and 53% specificity, (PPV 66%, NPV 89%). TTE showed 50% sensitivity and 82% specificity (PPV: 75%, NPV 61%), while CCT showed 33% sensitivity and 100% specificity (PPV 100%, NPV 33.3%). TCD had significantly higher sensitivity than TTE for RLS detection (p=0.039) with a non-significant difference in specificity (p=0.062), using TEE as the reference. Conclusions TCD has high sensitivity for RLS detection in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Conflict of interest Rachel Knopp: nothing to disclose; Kelly Flemming: nothing to disclose; Eugene Scharf: nothing to disclose; Zafer Keser: nothing to disclose; Jessica Prink: nothing to disclose; Shari Johnson: nothing to disclose; Guy Reeder: nothing to disclose; Robert Brown: nothing to disclose; William Harmsen: nothing to disclose; Muhib Khan: nothing to disclose Table 1 - belongs to Results
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rachel Knopp
Mayo Clinic
Kelly Flemming
Mayo Clinic
Eugene Scharf
Mayo Clinic
European Stroke Journal
Mayo Clinic
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Knopp et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Patent foramen ovale / right-to-left shunt (n=92). Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) vs. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) was evaluated on Sensitivity for right-to-left shunt detection relative to TEE (p=0.039). Transcranial Doppler ultrasound demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (94% vs 50%, p=0.039) than transthoracic echocardiogram for detecting right-to-left shunts relative to TEE.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f86bfa21ec5bbf07fe4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.225
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: