Abstract a. The Unsolvability of the Three famous Ancient Greek Problems Doubling the Cube, Trisecting the Angle, and Squaring the Circle -- Stands on the Base justification of the Algebraic Field Theory (specifically Galois Theory) and the Theory of Constructible Numbers, which were developed in the 19th century. b. The Greeks often used other Techniques (like Conic sections or Mechanical tools) to Solve these Problems, but their self-imposed "Euclidean" constraint, with a Ruler and a Compass, (straightedge and compass) made these Specific Problems impossible to solve. c. In the Published Articles 123, 124, 126, it is clearly evident that the Solution of the Ancient, Unsolved Greek Problems, using a Ruler and a Compass, as the constraint has been set by Euclid], Has Become Possible, and is in the Critique of Both, Human Logic Thinking and, The Artificial Intelligence when it uses The Path of Knowledge to the Truths of Nature, and which is the Dialectic Logic of Euclidean Geometry. In article 123, are given on the 2-Vectors, 3-Poles Rotation Squares Mechanism, where E = M, such the Geometrical as the Mechanical Proof, by using the Conjugate circles of Polhode and Herpolhode which consist the Spin of Photons and which is their motion. The frequency needed for the velocity vector c̄ to Rotate, is used from Kepler`s Unit meter of Time k = f²ₑ a³, where, a = λ / 2, and which is the clock measuring the changes of motions, In article 124, It was Noted that When in Photons, E = M, these acquire the common Plane-meter the Square CMNH = CM² − π. EC², where EC is the circle`s Radius, Using the Bellow-Motion Method by creating the Square CMNH = CM² from E, M, and from E/√2 ² = π. M/√2 ², π ≡ E/√2 ² / M/√2 ² and Thus Photon is Squared to an UNID SQUARE. In article 126, It is important to Note that When in Photons, E ≠ M, these acquire the common Space-meter³√2, Using Quantum-Cloning Method for creating a Perfect-Copy of E, M, as are when E = 2. M and, E ≠ M ³ = 2. E = 2. M ³. With this Way Photon is Dublicated to a New-One. The simplified But a Rigorous Proof of the Problem, The Squaring of the Circle using a Ruler and a Compass, as it was first Posed by the Ancient Greeks, is followed by The Photons which Square their, Energy circle ≡ the Herpolhode= SPIN, to equal an Energy Unit Square, which UNIT-Square they Promote, common Plane - meter, either as the Speed of the Photon which is their Electric Field, or they store it Perpendicularly to the motion in an equal area, The Anti-Square which is their Magnetic Field. Promotion is done at the Birefringence angle of 45º, and thus The Bellow-motion is their Torsional motion. At Phase Angle where E = 2. M, Energy Cube M / 2³ is Dublicated and enters INTO. E³ =2. M³=8. M³ ≡ Tetrahedron-Cube-Sphere-Mechanism. 102 From 40--The Special Problems of Euclidean Geometry 47 consist the, Moulds of Quantization, of E - Geometry in it, to become → Monad, through mould of Space – Anti-space in itself, which is the material Dipole in inner monad Structure and which is identical with the Electromagnetic cycloidal field → Linearly through the mould of the Parallel Theorem 44- 45, which are the equal distances between Points of Parallel and line → In Plane, through mould of Squaring the circle 46, where the Two Equal and Perpendicular Monad-Vectors, E=M, consist a Plane acquiring The common Plane-meter, π, and in Space (volume) through mould of Duplication of the Cube 46, where any Two Unequal Perpendicular monads, E≠M, acquire the common Space-meter ³√2, Using Quantum-Cloning Method to be Twice each other as analytically Proved-explained. The Unification of → Space and Energy ← becomes through STPL Geometrical Mould Mechanism of Elements, the minimum Energy - Quanta, In monads → Particles, Anti - Particles, Bosons, Gravity – Force, Gravity - Field, Photons, Dark Matter, and Dark - Energy, consisting the Material Dipoles in inner monad Structures, i. e. → the innate Electromagnetic Cycloidal Field of monads ← 39-41 Euclid’s elements consist of assuming a small set of intuitively appealing Axioms, Proving many other Propositions. Because No One until 9 succeeded to Prove the Parallel Postulate By means of Pure Geometric Logic, many self consistent Non - Euclidean Geometries have been discovered, Based on Definitions, Axioms or Postulates, in order that Non of them contradicts any of the other Postulates. It was Proved 39, that the only Space - Energy Geometry is Euclidean, agreeing with the Physical Reality on Unit AB ≡ Segment ≡ Vector which is The Electromagnetic field of the Quantized on AB Energy Space Vector of Angular Momentum= Spin, on the contrary to the General Relativity of Space-time which is based on the Rays of the Non-Euclidean Geometries to the limited velocity of light in Planck`s cavity. Euclidean Geometry elucidated the Definitions of its geometry - content, i. e. for Point, Segment, Straight Line, Plane, Volume, Space [S, Anti-space AS, Sub - space SS, Cave, The Space-Anti-Space Mechanism of the Six-Triple-Points-Line, that Produces and transfers Points of Spaces, Anti-Spaces and Sub-Spaces in a Common Inertial Sub-Space, and a cylinder, in Gravity field MFMF Particles and describes the Space-Energy vacuum beyond Plank´s length level Gravity`s Length 3, 969. 10¯⁶² m, reaching the absolute Point Lᵥ = eⁱ. (Nt/2) ᵇ=10¯ᴺ= −∞ m = 0 m, which is Nothing, and the Absolute Primary Neutral Space PNS = cave r = 10¯³⁵ ∼∼ 10¯⁶² m [43-46. In Physics, there is No single Process called "Duplication of Energy" for Photons Because Energy must always be conserved, or when Two Photons are "merged" into a single Photon. In Mechanics, The Gravity-cave Energy Volume quantity │ c̄ │ = wr is Doubled, and is Quantized in Planck`s- cave Space quantity (h/2π) = The Spin = 2. wr³ → i. e. Energy Space quantity wr is Quantized, doubled, and becomes the Space quantity h/π following Euclidean Space-moulds of Duplication of the cube, in Sphere volume V = (4π/3). wr³ and follows the Squaring of the circle π, and in Sub-Space-Sphere volume ³√2, as Trisection.
Markos Georgallides (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: