Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
BACKGROUND: Assessing multiple traditional risk factors improves prediction for late-life diseases, including coronary heart disease (CHD). It appears that non-traditional risk factors can also predict risk. The objective was to investigate contributions of non-traditional risk factors to coronary heart disease risk using a deficit accumulation approach. METHODS: Community-dwelling adults with no known history of CHD (n = 2195, mean age 46. 9±18. 7 years, 51. 8% women) participated in the 1995 Nova Scotia Health Survey. Three risk factor indices were constructed to quantify the proportion of deficits present in individuals: 1) a 17-item Non-Traditional Risk Factor Index (e. g. sinusitis, arthritis) ; 2) a 9-item Traditional Risk Factor Index (e. g. hypertension, diabetes) ; and 3) a frailty index (25 items combined from the other two index measures). Ten-year risks of CHD events (defined as CHD-related hospitalization and CHD-related mortality) were evaluated. RESULTS: The Non-Traditional Risk Factor Index, made up of health deficits unrelated to CHD, was independently associated with incident CHD events over 10 years after controlling for age, sex, and the Traditional Risk Factor Index adjusted adj. Hazard Ratio HR = 1. 31; Confidence Interval CI 1. 14-1. 51. When all health deficits, both those related and unrelated to CHD, were included in a frailty index the corresponding adjusted hazard ratio was 1. 61; CI 1. 40-1. 85. CONCLUSION: Both traditional and non-traditional risk factor indices are independently associated with incident CHD events. CHD risk assessment may benefit from consideration of general health information as well as from traditional risk factors.
Wallace et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: