• Please read through all the templates before choosing • Pick the most relevant text template(s) from the following page and delete all others.• Edit the text as necessary, ensuring that the original incorrect text is included for the record, please see the below. • Please do not use any extra formatting when editing the templates, and only modify the red text unless absolutely necessary • Submit following the instructions on this page.When the original text contained incorrect information, to preserve the scientific record, please include that text when editing the below templates. For example:There was a mistake in the Funding statement, an incorrect number was used. The correct number is "2015C03Bd051.". The publisher apologizes for this mistake.The original version of this article has been updated.In the published article, there was a mistake in the Funding statement. The funding statement for the Key Development Project of the Department of Science and Technology was displayed as "2015CBd051". The correct statement is "Key Development Project of Department of Science and Technology (2015C03Bd051).''Wrong content There was a mistake in Figure 1 There was a mistake in Figure 1 as published. Figure 1 was mixed up. This is the corrected Figure 1: The original version of this article has been updated.The Figures 1234were in the wrong order in the PDF version of this paper. The order has now been corrected. The original version of this article has been updated.Adding/removing text A correction has been made to the section Section "Results", Sub Section "Glycocalyx Damage Parameters during NMP", Subsub Section "Heparan Sulfate", Paragraph "1". The Sentence: "No significant dynamics of heparan sulfate were observed during NMP (p = 0.100) (Figure 4)" should be changed to: "No significant dynamics of heparan sulfate were observed during NMP (p = 0.100) (Figure 2)."A correction has been made to the section Section "Results", Sub Section "Outcome Associations of Glycocalyx Injury During NMP", Paragraph "1". The Sentence: "Furthermore, perfusate syndecan-1 values where significantly higher in grafts of recipients who developed EAD (n = 10) compared to those without EAD (n = 11) (4,331.5 (4,180.3-5,033.7) ng/mL vs. 2,800.7 (2,480.5-3,618.7) ng/mL; p = 0.024 and 9,379.7 (6,181-104,923) ng/mL vs. 4,338.9 (3,730-6,201.3) ng/mL; p = 0.013 and 8,663.6 (6,926.2-11,551.9) ng/mL vs. 5,096.5 (3,795-5,679.5) ng/mL; p = 0.013) (Figure 2)." should be changed to: "Furthermore, perfusate syndecan-1 values where significantly higher in grafts of recipients who developed EAD (n = 10) compared to those without EAD (n = 11) (4,331.5 (4,033.7) ng/mL vs. 2,800.7 (2,618.7) ng/mL;p = 0.024 and 9,379.7 (6,923) ng/mL vs. 4,338.9 (3,201.3) ng/mL;p = 0.013 and 8,663.6 (6,551.9) ng/mL vs. 5,096.5 (3,679.5) ng/mL; p = 0.013) (Figure 3)."A correction has been made to the section Section "Results", Sub Section "Outcome Associations of Glycocalyx Injury During NMP", Paragraph "2". The Sentence: "Grafts that were classified as transplantable (n = 23) exhibited significantly lower syndecan-1 levels at the onset of perfusion (3,892.6 (2,883.7-4,561.2) ng/mL) and after six hours of perfusion (5,915.7 (4,082.2-9,379.7) ng/mL) when compared to grafts that were classified as unsuitable for transplantation due to their metabolic profile (5,653.7 (5,074-11,706.6) ng/mL; p = 0.001 and 7,764.8 (7,133.6-12,740.7) ng/mL; p = 0.037) (Figure 3)." should be changed to "Grafts that were classified as transplantable (n = 23) exhibited significantly lower syndecan-1 levels at the onset of perfusion (3,892.6 (2,883.7-4,561.2) ng/mL) and after six hours of perfusion (5,915.7 (4,082.2-9,379.7) ng/mL) when compared to grafts that were classified as unsuitable for transplantation due to their metabolic profile (5,653.7 (5,074-11,706.6) ng/mL; p = 0.001 and 7,764.8 (7,133.6-12,740.7) ng/mL; p = 0.037) (Figure 4)."A correction has been made to the section Section "Results", Sub Section "Glycocalyx Damage Parameters in the Recipient", Paragraph "2". The Sentence: "However, from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 2 (24.3 (13.2-35.1) ng/mL; p = 0.006) and postoperative day 3 (18.7 (10.1-30.8) ng/mL; p = 0.008), heparan sulfate levels experienced a decrease, reaching values below the preoperative baseline (p = 0.006) (Figure 4)." should be changed to "However, from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 2 (24.3 (13.2-35.1) ng/mL; p = 0.006) and postoperative day 3 (18.7 (10.1-30.8) ng/mL; p = 0.008), heparan sulfate levels experienced a decrease, reaching values below the preoperative baseline (p = 0.006) (Figure 2)."The original version of this article has been updated.If you would like to request a correction for a reason not seen here, please contact the journal's editorial office.
Mathis et al. (Wed,) studied this question.