PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 11, 2026European Review of Contract Law0 citationsOpen Access

143Due Diligence and Liability Under the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive

View Full Paper
JSJaakko Salminen

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the due diligence and liability aspects of the EU's Corporate Sustainability Directive, contrasting them with existing supply chain governance practices.
  • Conducted a comparative doctrinal study
  • Examined private supply chain governance through the Accord on Fire and Building Safety
  • Investigated national and transnational private law doctrines relating to liability
  • The directive reveals tendencies towards the transnationalization of local contracting rules.
  • There is a potential shift in focus from causation to prioritization in a data-rich economic context.
  • The directive's liability provisions reflect gaps in production-related liabilities across European legal systems.

Abstract

Abstract I undertake a comparative doctrinal study of the due diligence and liability provisions of the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, also accounting for some of the changes and omissions proposed under the so-called “Omnibus” process to streamline the already passed directive. In relation to the due diligence provisions, my main thrust is in comparing the directive to the practice-oriented state-of-the-art of private supply chain governance, the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh. In relation to the liability provisions (or proposed lack thereof), my focus is on the development of both national and transnational private law doctrine and regulation in European legal systems to account for production related liability deficits. While lacklustre in many ways, the directive signals interesting tendencies. The gradual black letter transnationalization of local rules of reasonability in contracting (even if based on international consensus) is one. The possible shift in importance from causation to rules of prioritization in a data-rich global economy is, potentially, another.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jaakko Salminen (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0172233a9f334c28272451https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2026-2009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The corporate sustainability due diligence directive: a law and economics evaluation2026
  2. 2Civil Law, Conflict of Laws, and Extraterritoriality in the European Supply Chain Due Diligence Law2024 · 4 citations
  3. 3The EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive: Legal Character, Enforcement Challenges, and Global Policy Implications2026
  4. 4The European Corporate Sustainability Directives: Extending the Common Law Duty of Care?2026
  5. 5Unboxing the New EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive2024 · 1 citations