Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Medical image quality assessment (MIQA) is vital in medical imaging and directly affects diagnosis, patient treatment, and general clinical results. Accurate and high-quality imaging is necessary to make accurate diagnoses, efficiently design treatments, and consistently monitor diseases. This review summarizes forty-two research studies on diverse MIQA approaches and their effects on performance in diagnostics, patient results, and efficiency in the process. It contrasts subjective (manual assessment) and objective (rule-driven) evaluation methods, underscores the growing promise of machine intelligence and machine learning (ML) in MIQA automation, and describes the existing MIQA challenges. AI-powered tools are revolutionizing MIQA with automated quality checks, noise reduction, and artifact removal, producing consistent and reliable imaging evaluation. Enhanced image quality is demonstrated in every examination to improve diagnostic precision and support decision making in the clinic. However, challenges still exist, such as variability in quality and variability in human ratings and small datasets hindering standardization. These must be addressed with better-quality data, low-cost labeling, and standardization. Ultimately, this paper reinforces the need for high-quality medical imaging and the potential of MIQA with the power of AI. It is crucial to advance research in this area to advance healthcare.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
H. M. S. S. Herath
Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology
H.M.K.K.M.B. Herath
Open University of Sri Lanka
Nuwan Madusanka
Pukyong National University
Journal of Imaging
Pukyong National University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Herath et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a018cd41adb974501cae81e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging11040100
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: