PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 12, 20260 citationsOpen Access

AI Alignment as a Constrained Dynamical System: Separating Inference and Safety via Projection Operators

View Full Paper
RSRyan ScottACAlexander Jorge Cisneros

Key Points

  • To interpret AI alignment through the lens of constrained dynamical systems, emphasizing the separation of inference and safety.
  • Introduced a divergence-based metric for alignment distortion.
  • Decomposed latency into computational and policy components.
  • Defined a taxonomy of safety gating mechanisms.
  • Modeling alignment as a continuous constraint process rather than a behavioral overlay.
  • Established connections between AI alignment and control theory for better analysis of tradeoffs.
  • Enabled measurable analysis of safety-performance tradeoffs.

Abstract

Abstract We present a formal interpretation of AI alignment as a constrained dynamical system, in which unconstrained probabilistic reasoning is projected into a safety-compliant state space. This framework separates core inference from safety enforcement, modeling alignment as acontinuous constraint process rather than a behavioral overlay. We introduce a divergence-based conceptual metric for alignment-induced distortion, decompose latency into computational and policy components, and define a taxonomy of safety gating mechanisms. This perspective connects AI alignment with control theory and constrained optimization, enabling measurable analysis of safety-performance tradeoffs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Scott et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a02c364ce8c8c81e9640b52https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20103547
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper