Isolated nocturnal hypertension was prevalent (10.9%) and associated with higher arterial stiffness, including central augmentation index (140% vs 134%, P<0.05), compared to normotension.
Cross-Sectional (n=677)
Is isolated nocturnal hypertension associated with increased arterial stiffness in a Chinese population?
Isolated nocturnal hypertension is prevalent among Chinese individuals, often missed by conventional office measurements, and is associated with increased arterial stiffness.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 140% vs 134%
valor p: p=<0.05
We reported previously that normotensive Chinese had higher nighttime diastolic blood pressure compared with non-Chinese. We, therefore, studied the prevalence and characteristics of isolated nocturnal hypertension (HT) and its association with arterial stiffness, an intermediate sign of target organ damage. We recorded ambulatory blood pressure, the central and peripheral systolic augmentation indexes, the ambulatory arterial stiffness index, and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity in 677 Chinese enrolled in the JingNing population study (53.6% women; mean age: 47.6 years). Prevalence was 10.9% for isolated nocturnal HT (>or=120/70 mm Hg from 10:00 pm to 4:00 am), 4.9% for isolated daytime HT (>or=135/85 mm Hg from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm), and 38.4% for day-night HT. Patients with isolated nocturnal HT, compared with subjects with ambulatory normotension (45.8%), were older (53.7 versus 40.7 years), more often reported alcohol intake (68.9% versus 51.0%), had faster nighttime pulse rate (62.8 versus 60.7 bpm), had higher serum cholesterol (5.12 versus 4.77 mmol/L), and had higher blood glucose (4.84 versus 4.38 mmol/L). Similar to patients with isolated daytime HT or day-night HT, patients with isolated nocturnal HT had higher indexes of arterial stiffness (Por=140/90 mm Hg). In conclusion, isolated nocturnal HT can only be diagnosed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, is prevalent among Chinese, and is associated with increased arterial stiffness.
Li et al. (Tue,) conducted a cross-sectional in Isolated nocturnal hypertension (n=677). Isolated nocturnal hypertension vs. Ambulatory normotension was evaluated on Central augmentation index (p=<0.05). Isolated nocturnal hypertension was prevalent (10.9%) and associated with higher arterial stiffness, including central augmentation index (140% vs 134%, P<0.05), compared to normotension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: