The member of parliament is the main key to moving the legislative authority, Through the main voles assigned to him, Whether at the national level as a representative of the nation or from during his local role as a product of his electoral of his electoral district that bought him to the parliamentary seat, and this All for the sake of parliamentary performance that pushes the legislative institution forward to embody its independence. But on a realistic level, the phenomenon of absence is observed, which has Cast a shadow over the institution legislative seats have become vacant during discussions and during voting for that the idea of delegation was proposed as one of the proposed mechanism to reduce the phenomenon of parliamentary absence whether with or without a legitimate excuse. The research aims to shed light on the nature of delegation and its types and on the principle of the MP’s obligatory attendance at the work of the House of Representatives (attending plenary sessions and parliamentary committee sessions) and presenting jurisprudential trends. This research will be divided into three sections. The first section will be devoted to the nature of delegation, and in the second section we will discuss jurisprudential trends within the framework of Parliamentary mandate. The third section will be devoted to the principle of mandatory attendance of representatives. Supporting and rejecting the idea of delegation,
Span Mustafa (Fri,) studied this question.