Abstract Modern bank resolution regimes emerged in the aftermath of the global financial crisis as structured alternatives to ad hoc crisis management. While international standards, in particular the Financial Stability Board’s Key Attributes, have shaped their design, implementation remains uneven across jurisdictions. Focusing on Hong Kong and Singapore, this contribution examines the architecture of their resolution frameworks, with particular emphasis on bail-in mechanisms, loss-absorbing capacity requirements and resolution financing arrangements, and situates these within the broader international policy debate.
Christian Hofmann (Fri,) studied this question.