What question did this study set out to answer?

This study aims to develop a framework for simulating hydraulic fracture propagation considering poroelastic effects.

May 15, 2026

A Coupled Extended Finite Element–Cohesive Zone Model for Hydraulic Fracture Propagation Under Poroelastic Effects Across Different Propagation Regimes

Puntos clave

This study aims to develop a framework for simulating hydraulic fracture propagation considering poroelastic effects.
Developed a coupled hydraulic fracture propagation framework using XFEM-CZM in Abaqus.
Compared XFEM-CZM with FEM-CZM and FEM-DDM in four different propagation regimes.
Conducted sensitivity analyses on key XFEM parameters such as tensile strength and fracture energy.
XFEM-CZM predictions closely align with numerical solutions under fluid storage and viscosity conditions.
Tensile strength significantly affects net pressure and aperture, while fracture energy influences length and resistance.
Initial crack length impacts early pressure response.

Resumen

ABSTRACT Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing remains challenging due to the strong coupling between geomechanics and fluid flow when modelling multiple physical mechanisms of rock deformation, fracture evolution and fluid leak‐off. This study develops a coupled hydraulic fracture propagation framework that combines the extended finite element method with a cohesive zone model (XFEM–CZM) in Abaqus. The XFEM–CZM model is subjected to a systematic comparative analysis with established numerical approaches, specifically the finite element method with a cohesive zone model (FEM–CZM) and the finite element method coupled with the displacement discontinuity method (FEM–DDM). Predictions of aperture, length, and net pressure are validated against in four limiting regimes: toughness–storage, toughness–leak‐off, viscosity–storage and viscosity–leak‐off. Several cases vary isotropic and anisotropic permeability, leak‐off, viscosity, and mesh size to investigate poroelastic effects on fracture propagation and to enable direct comparison with previous studies. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is conducted on key XFEM parameters, including tensile strength, fracture energy under field‐relevant toughness–leak‐off conditions. Results show close agreement where fluid storage and viscosity dominate; under viscosity–leak‐off conditions, XFEM–CZM aligns more closely with numerical solutions than with analytical solutions. Sensitivity analyses reveal the effects of key parameters, including tensile strength, fracture energy, and initial crack length, on fracture growth: tensile strength mainly governs net pressure and aperture; fracture energy impacts fracture length and propagation resistance; and initial crack length primarily affects early‐time pressure response. This study simulates fractures across diverse regimes and provides guidance for parameter calibration, improved fracture characterization and design optimization in complex formations.

Me gusta

Guardar