Between 2000 and 2017, the incidence of cardiogenic shock in STEMI increased from 5.8% to 13.0%, while in-hospital mortality decreased from 49.6% to 32.7% (aOR 0.29; 95% CI 0.28-0.31; P<0.001).
Observational (n=4,300,000)
Sí
Between 2000 and 2017 in the US, the incidence of cardiogenic shock complicating STEMI increased 2.5-fold, but in-hospital mortality significantly decreased alongside increased use of coronary angiography and PCI.
Estimación del efecto: aOR 0.29 (95% CI 0.28-0.31)
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 32.7% vs 49.6%
valor p: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the temporal trends, incidence, and outcomes of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS). METHODS: Adult (>18 years) STEMI-CS admissions were identified using the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2017) and classified by tertiles of admission year (2000-2005, 2006-2011, 2012-2017). Outcomes of interest included temporal trends, acute organ failure, cardiac procedures, in-hospital mortality, hospitalization costs, and length of stay. RESULTS: In ∼4. 3 million STEMI admissions, CS was noted in 368, 820 (8. 5%). STEMI-CS incidence increased from 5. 8% in 2000 to 13. 0% in 2017 (patient and hospital characteristics adjusted odds ratio aOR 2. 45 95% confidence interval CI 2. 40-2. 49; P 0. 05). CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, incidence of CS in STEMI has increased 2. 5-fold between 2000 and 2017, while in-hospital mortality has decreased during the study period. Use of coronary angiography and PCI increased during the study period.
Vallabhajosyula et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) (n=4,300,000). Admission year 2017 vs. Admission year 2000 was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (aOR 0.29, 95% CI 0.28-0.31, p=<0.001). Between 2000 and 2017, the incidence of cardiogenic shock in STEMI increased from 5.8% to 13.0%, while in-hospital mortality decreased from 49.6% to 32.7% (aOR 0.29; 95% CI 0.28-0.31; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: