Bottom‐Up Evaluation of the Methane Budget in Asia and Its Subregions

Abstract A comprehensive methane (CH 4 ) budget, including spatial and temporal patterns of sources and sinks, is pivotal for effective climatic mitigation and prediction. This study used a bottom‐up approach to evaluate the CH 4 budget of Asia during 1970–2021. Natural sources and sinks were evaluated using a process‐based biogeochemical model and with ground and satellite observations. Anthropogenic sources were evaluated using emission inventories produced by socioeconomic studies. During the 1970s and 2010s, anthropogenic emissions accounted for 78% and 84% of the emitted total CH 4 budget of 140.2 and 207.6 Tg CH 4 yr −1 , respectively. Anthropogenic sources were responsible for a 49% increase in total emissions. During 2001–2021, Central, East, South, Southeast, and West Asia accounted for 3.3%, 35.1%, 25.6%, 23.1%, and 13.0%, respectively, of Asian emissions. Sectoral compositions and temporal variations differed among subregions. Emissions from paddy field soils in Asia were smaller in 2021 (33.6 Tg CH 4 yr −1 ) than in 1970 (39.2 Tg CH 4 yr −1 ) because of changes in agricultural production. Among natural sources, wetlands accounted for 63% of total emissions in East Asia, but geological emissions predominated in Central and West Asia. Interannual variability of the net CH 4 budget was mainly due to wetland and biomass burning emissions, whereas decadal variability was due to anthropogenic sectors. δ 13 C‐CH 4 and isoflux analysis of sector‐specific fluxes and isotopic ratios indicated the effects of the regional budget on atmospheric trends. Bottom‐up evaluations of regional budgets can provide information critical to the Global Stocktake of the Paris Agreement, the Global Methane Pledge, and other related actions.