Functional electrical stimulation of the legs produced similar improvements in 6-minute walk distance (40.6m vs 44.6m) compared to conventional bicycle training in patients with chronic heart failure.
RCT (n=46)
Does functional electrical stimulation of the legs improve exercise capacity and muscle performance compared to conventional bicycle exercise training in patients with stable chronic heart failure?
Functional electrical stimulation of the legs is a safe and effective alternative to conventional bicycle exercise for home-based rehabilitation in patients with stable chronic heart failure.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 40.6% vs 44.6%
AIMS: Recent guidelines recommend regular exercise in the management of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). This study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of conventional bicycle exercise and functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the legs as forms of home-based exercise training for patients with stable CHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-six patients (38 male) with stable NYHA Class II/III heart failure underwent a 6-week training programme using either a bicycle ergometer or electrical stimulation of the quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles. In the bike group, significant increases were seen in 6-min walk (44.6m, 95% confidence interval (CI) 29.3-60.9 m), treadmill exercise time (110 s, 95% CI 72.2-148.0 s), maximum leg strength (5.32 kg, 95% CI 3.18-7.45 kg), and quadriceps fatigue index (0.08, 95% CI 0.04-0.12) following training. In the stimulator group, similar significant increases were seen following training for 6-min walk (40.6m, 95% CI 28.2-53.0m), treadmill exercise time (67 s, 95% CI 11.8-121.8s), maximum leg strength (5.35 kg, 95% CI 1.53-9.17 kg), and quadriceps fatigue index (0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.17). Peak VO(2)did not change in either group following training, indicating a low-intensity regime. Quality of life scores improved following training when the bicycle and stimulator groups were considered together, but not when considered separately (-0.43, 95% CI -8.13 to -0.56). CONCLUSIONS: FES produces beneficial changes in muscle performance and exercise capacity in patients with CHF. Within this study, the benefits were similar to those observed following bicycle training. FES could be offered to patients with heart failure as an alternative to bicycle training as part of a home-based rehabilitation programme.
Stuart Harris (Thu,) conducted a rct in chronic heart failure (n=46). Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the legs vs. Conventional bicycle exercise was evaluated on 6-min walk distance increase. Functional electrical stimulation of the legs produced similar improvements in 6-minute walk distance (40.6m vs 44.6m) compared to conventional bicycle training in patients with chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: