Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
In this paper, we examine the importance of year, industry, corporate-parent, and businessspecific effects on the profitability of U.S. public corporations within specific 4-digit SIC categories. Our results indicate that year, industry, corporate-parent, and business-specific effects account for 2 percent, 19 percent, 4 percent, and 32 percent, respectively, of the aggregate variance in profitability. We also find that the importance of the effects differs substantially across broad economic sectors. Industry effects account for a smaller portion of profit variance in manufacturing but a larger portion in lodging/entertainment, services, wholesale/retail trade, and transportation. Across all sectors we find a negative covariance between corporate-parent and industry effects. A detailed analysis suggests that industry, corporate-parent, and business-specific effects are related in complex ways. © 1997 by John Wiley Sons, Ltd. Debate in strategy has long focused on the performance has received scant empirical study, sources of performance differences among firms. reflecting both the unavailability of data and chal-In the research growing out of the industrial- lenging statistical difficulties. Rumelt (1991) is organization tradition, industry structure is a cen- perhaps the most influential study. Rumelt’s
McGahan et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: