Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract The surge in online self-administered surveys has given rise to an extensive body of literature on respondent inattention, also known as careless or insufficient effort responding. This burgeoning literature has outlined the consequences of inattention and made important strides in developing effective methods to identify inattentive respondents. However, differences in terminology, as well as a multiplicity of different methods for measuring and correcting for inattention, have made this literature unwieldy. We present an overview of the current state of this literature, highlighting commonalities, emphasizing key debates, and outlining open questions deserving of future research. Additionally, we emphasize the key considerations that survey researchers should take into account when measuring attention.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Adam J. Berinsky
Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology
Alejandro Frydman
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Michele F. Margolis
California University of Pennsylvania
Public Opinion Quarterly
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
University of Pennsylvania
Temple University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Berinsky et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08bf65d9bfbc371b01e612 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfae004
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: