Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
This paper proposes a new method for planning randomized clinical trials. This method is especially suited to comparison of a best standard or control treatment with an experimental treatment. Patients are allocated into two groups by a random or chance mechanism. Patients in the first group receive standard treatment; those in the second group are asked if they will accept the experimental therapy; if they decline, they receive the best standard treatment. In the analyses of results, all those in the second group, regardless of treatment, are compared with those in the first group. Any loss of statistical efficiency can be overcome by increased numbers. This experimental plan is indeed a randomized clinical trial and has the advantage that, before providing consent, a patient will know whether an experimental treatment is to be used.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
New England Journal of Medicine
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.
Marvin Zelen (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: