Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
The results of a deep imaging and spectroscopic optical survey are presented. Three small areas of sky at 13 h, 17 h, and 22 h have been imaged to faint levels in four passbands (U', B, V, and I) in the optical window. These reach approximately 27th magnitude for galaxy images, at which point the surface density of galaxies is roughly 2. 5 x 10⁵^ deg^-2^. A complete catalog of objects to IAB_ ~ 24. 5 is provided as the basis for future studies of the faint extragalactic population. Spectroscopic observations of a small but essentially complete sample of galaxies in and around the 22 h field have yielded redshifts for a high fraction of galaxies with BAB_ ~ 0. 4, and close to that predicted from nonevolving models of the local galaxy population, despite the substantial enhancement that is seen in the galaxy number counts relative to these same models. A nonparametric analysis confirms that this excess relative to the nonevolution case persists even if the faint galaxy population is used to define the "nonevolving" population, emphasizing that the effect is not caused by a gross misrepresentation of the true local population. The general relationship between the surface number density of a sample of galaxies and their modal redshift is discussed for various parametric forms of the evolution of the luminosity function. The low redshifts encountered at B ~ 24 extend the trend noted by other workers to considerably fainter levels, and this indicates that the evolution for galaxies to z ~ 0. 5 is best characterized as an increase in the apparent φ^*^ rather than in L^*^. Some mechanisms for producing an apparent increase in φ^*^ are reviewed, including luminosity-dependent luminosity evolution, an incorrect cosmological volume element, and the possibility of seeing galaxies that have subsequently disappeared in the sense of failing to meet the detection criteria for local galaxies. One of the faint and very blue "flat- spectrum" galaxies in this field has the spectrum of an extragalactic H II region at z = 0. 13, but the other two remain stubbornly unidentifiable, including SSA 22-24, for which we had earlier suggested a redshift of 3. 3 which we are not able to confirm. The nature of these flat-spectrum objects is discussed, and it is concluded that a high-redshift population remains the most likely, but unproved, explanation. Finally, we explore the implications of the very high number surface density of galaxies seen at 26th magnitude and highlight the difficulties of accounting for these galaxies with models that conserve the numbers of galaxies.
Lilly et al. (Fri,) studied this question.