The APPLE score showed superior prediction of arrhythmia recurrences after repeat AF catheter ablation compared to CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (AUC 0.617 vs 0.577 and 0.590; P<0.001).
Cohort (n=379)
No
Does the APPLE score improve the prediction of arrhythmia recurrences compared to CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores in patients undergoing repeat AF catheter ablation?
The APPLE score provides superior prediction of arrhythmia recurrences after repeat AF catheter ablation compared to standard CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores.
Estimación del efecto: AUC 0.617
valor p: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: Arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation occur in up to 50% within one year but their prediction remains challenging. Recently, we developed a novel score for the prediction of rhythm outcomes after single AF ablation demonstrating superiority to other scores. The current study was performed to 1) prove the predictive value of the APPLE score in patients undergoing repeat AF ablation and 2) compare it with the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores. METHODS: Rhythm outcome between 3-12 months after AF ablation were documented. The APPLE score (one point for Age >65 years, Persistent AF, imPaired eGFR (<60 ml/min/1.73m2), LA diameter ≥43 mm, EF <50%) was calculated in every patient before procedure. RESULTS: 379 consecutive patients from The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry (60±10 years, 65% male, 70% paroxysmal AF) undergoing repeat AF catheter ablation were included. Arrhythmia recurrences were observed in 133 patients (35%). While the CHADS2 (AUC 0.577, p = 0.037) and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (AUC 0.590, p = 0.015) demonstrated low predictive value, the APPLE score showed better prediction of arrhythmia recurrences (AUC 0.617, p = 0.002) than other scores (both p<0.001). Compared to patients with an APPLE score of 0, the risk (OR) for arrhythmia recurrences was 2.9, 3.0 and 6.0 (all p<0.01) for APPLE scores 1, 2, or ≥3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The novel APPLE score is superior to the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for prediction of rhythm outcomes after repeat AF catheter ablation. It may be helpful to identify patients with low, intermediate or high risk for recurrences after repeat procedure.
Kornej et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=379). APPLE score vs. CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores was evaluated on Arrhythmia recurrences between 3-12 months after AF ablation (AUC 0.617, p=<0.001). The APPLE score showed superior prediction of arrhythmia recurrences after repeat AF catheter ablation compared to CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (AUC 0.617 vs 0.577 and 0.590; P<0.001).