Acutely increasing coronary flow with intracoronary adenosine decreased microvascular resistance (362.5 to 156.7 mm Hg/s/m, p<0.001) but did not increase contractility in systolic heart failure.
Does acutely increasing coronary flow increase contractility, or do changes in contractility determine coronary flow in patients with dyssynchronous left ventricular heart failure?
In patients with dyssynchronous systolic heart failure, changes in coronary flow during biventricular pacing are a consequence of enhanced cardiac contractility rather than the cause.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 156.7% vs 362.5%
valor p: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: Biventricular pacing has been shown to increase both cardiac contractility and coronary flow acutely but the causal relationship is unclear. We hypothesised that changes in coronary flow are secondary to changes in cardiac contractility. We sought to examine this relationship by modulating coronary flow and cardiac contractility. METHODS: Contractility and lusitropy were altered by varying the location of pacing in 8 patients. Coronary autoregulation was transiently disabled with intracoronary adenosine. Simultaneous coronary flow velocity, coronary pressure and left ventricular pressure data were measured in the different pacing settings with and without hyperaemia and wave intensity analysis performed. RESULTS: -15% to +17% compared to baseline). Intracoronary adenosine decreased microvascular resistance (362.5 mm Hg/s/m to 156.7 mm Hg/s/m, p < 0.001) and increased LAD flow velocity (22 cm/s vs 45 cm/s, p < 0.001) but did not acutely change contractility or lusitropy. The magnitude of the dominant accelerating wave, the Backward Expansion Wave, was proportional to the degree of contractility as well as lusitropy (r = 0.47, p < 0.01 and r = -0.50, p < 0.01). Perfusion efficiency (the proportion of accelerating waves) increased at hyperaemia (76% rest vs 81% hyperaemia, p = 0.04). Perfusion efficiency correlated with contractility and lusitropy at rest (r = 0.43 & -0.50 respectively, p = 0.01) and hyperaemia (r = 0.59 & -0.6, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Acutely increasing coronary flow with adenosine in patients with systolic heart failure does not increase contractility. Changes in coronary flow with biventricular pacing are likely to be a consequence of enhanced cardiac contractility from resynchronization and not vice versa.
Claridge et al. (Tue,) conducted a other in Dyssynchronous left ventricular heart failure (n=8). Intracoronary adenosine and varying pacing location vs. Baseline/rest was evaluated on Microvascular resistance (mm Hg/s/m) (p=<0.001). Acutely increasing coronary flow with intracoronary adenosine decreased microvascular resistance (362.5 to 156.7 mm Hg/s/m, p<0.001) but did not increase contractility in systolic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: