PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1983Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology132 citations

Role of Cardiac Electrophysiologic Studies in Patients with Unexplained Recurrent Syncope

View Full Paper
MAMasood AkhtarMSMohammad ShenasaSDStephen Denker

Structured PICO

Does cardiac electrophysiologic study with programmed electrical stimulation identify the etiology and guide therapy to prevent recurrence in patients with unexplained recurrent syncope?

P
Population
30 patients with unexplained recurrent syncope despite thorough medical and neurologic evaluation, 12-lead surface ECG, extended in-hospital and/or ambulatory monitoring (≥48 hours), and exercise testing.
I
Intervention
Cardiac electrophysiologic studies (EPS) with programmed electrical stimulation (PES)
O
Outcome
Identification of possible arrhythmic etiology for syncope and recurrence of symptoms during follow-uphard clinical

EPS with PES is useful in identifying arrhythmic causes of unexplained syncope, particularly in patients with structural heart disease, and guides effective therapy to prevent recurrence.

Abstract

Cardiac electrophysiologic studies (EPS) with programmed electrical stimulation (PES) were performed in 30 patients with recurrent syncope to uncover possible arrhythmic etiology. All patients had undergone thorough medical and neurologic evaluation prior to EPS without finding a definitive cause for syncope. In the majority of patients an arrhythmic etiology for syncope was suspected but could not be documented utilizing the 12-lead surface ECG, extended in-hospital and/or ambulatory monitoring (for greater than or equal to 48 hours) and exercise testing prior to the EPS. The studies provided a clue to the possible underlying rhythm disturbance which could have caused syncope in 16/30 patients. Sustained or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation was induced in 11/30, sinus node dysfunction in 4/30 and intra-His block in the remaining one. Fourteen of the 16 have remained free of symptoms following therapy based on results of EPS during a follow-up period ranging from 6-30 months (mean 16.5 +/- 7.8). In 2/16 syncope recurred (one arrhythmic and one non-arrhythmic) despite pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction detected during EPS. In the remaining 14/30 patients, EPS and PES did not induce arrhythmia which could account for patient symptomatology and therefore no specific therapy could be recommended. Eleven of these 14 patients experienced a recurrence of symptoms within a 6-25 month period (mean 16.2 +/- 6.8). Of the 16 patients with inducible arrhythmias considered clinically significant, 15 had associated structural heart disease. On the other hand, of the 14 patients without clinically significant arrhythmias, structural heart disease could be detected in only three. It is concluded that cardiac arrhythmias constitute a common cause of unexplained syncope, particularly in patients with structural heart disease, and that EPS with PES can uncover the type of arrhythmic disturbance in a significant number of cases.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Akhtar et al. (1983) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ba0e953c707319ec20808https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1983.tb04346.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper