A Comparative Evaluation of Conventional Dissection, Plastibell, and Gomco Clamp Techniques for Neonatal Circumcision: A Focus on Wound Healing and Cosmetic Results | Synapse
May 19, 2026Open Access
A Comparative Evaluation of Conventional Dissection, Plastibell, and Gomco Clamp Techniques for Neonatal Circumcision: A Focus on Wound Healing and Cosmetic Results
Puntos clave
This evaluation aims to compare the effectiveness of three circumcision techniques in terms of wound healing and cosmetic results.
Comparative evaluation of Conventional Dissection, Plastibell, and Gomco Clamp techniques.
Assessments focused on wound healing and cosmetic outcomes post-circumcision.
Wound healing was faster in the Plastibell group (median time 5 days vs. 7 days for Gomco).
Overall satisfaction rates differed among techniques, with Gomco Clamp showing lower satisfaction (75% vs. 90% for Plastibell).
Resumen
A Comparative Evaluation of Conventional Dissection, Plastibell, and Gomco Clamp Techniques for Neonatal Circumcision: A Focus on Wound Healing and Cosmetic Results