Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
The article raised the question of the role of the Pushkinian principle in the philosophical and aesthetic system of Yu.I.Aykhenvald, one of the leading critics of the Silver Age. The given review of Aykhenvalds publications on Pushkin and Pushkin studies of the first quarter of the twentieth century and analysis of Aykhenvalds attitude to V.G.Belinskys and D.S. Merezhkovskys statements about Pushkin allowed defining more clearly the position of the literator, his approaches and methods. Aykhenvalds articles about AnnaAkhmatova, V.Bryusov, I.Bunin demonstrate that the involvement in the Pushkin tradition was for Aykhenvald the most important aesthetic criterion in assessing the modern literary process. Besides, the article regards the question of perception of Pushkins studies of Aykhenvald by his contemporaries writers (B.Zaitsev, B.Sadovskoy, V.Khodasevich), literary scholars (S.A.Vengerov, B.M.Eichenbaum, A.P.Skaftymov), cultural historians (P.M.Bicilli) and representatives of Russian religious philosophy (S.L.Frank, A.F.Losev). It is concluded that, in contrast to literary historians, the phenomenon of Aykhenvald was for philosophically minded admirers of his critical talent a confirmation of the unity of national culture, the irreducibility of the nation to nationality and Pushkin as its main symbol.
Еlena А. Takho-Godi (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: