Magneto-fluorescent nanoparticle CMR provided better image contrast compared with conventional CMR (CNR change 46% vs 8%, P<0.001) for detecting myocardial inflammation in a rat model.
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance with magneto-fluorescent nanoparticles improve the detection and grading of myocardial inflammation compared to conventional CMR in a rat model of experimental autoimmune myocarditis?
Magneto-fluorescent nanoparticle CMR provides superior noninvasive visualization and grading of myocardial inflammation compared to conventional CMR in a preclinical model of myocarditis.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 46% vs 8%
valor p: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: Limited availability of noninvasive and biologically precise diagnostic tools poses a challenge for the evaluation and management of patients with myocarditis. METHODS AND RESULTS: The feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging with magneto-fluorescent nanoparticles (MNPs) for detection of myocarditis and its effectiveness in discriminating inflammation grades were assessed in experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) (n=65) and control (n=10) rats. After undergoing CMR, rats were administered with MNPs, followed by a second CMR 24 hours later. Head-to-head comparison of MNP-CMR with T(2)-weighted, early and late gadolinium enhancement CMR was performed in additional EAM (n=10) and control (n=5) rats. Contrast-to-noise ratios were measured and compared between groups. Flow cytometry and microscopy demonstrated that infiltrating inflammatory cells engulfed MNPs, resulting in altered myocardial T(2)* effect. Changes in contrast-to-noise ratio between pre- and post-MNP CMR were significantly greater in EAM rats (1.08 ± 0.10 versus 0.48 ± 0.20; P<0.001). In addition, contrast-to-noise ratio measurement in MNP-CMR clearly detected the extent of inflammation (P<0.001) except for mild inflammation. Compared with conventional CMR, MNP-CMR provided better image contrast (CNR change 8% versus 46%, P<0.001) and detectability of focal myocardial inflammation. Notably, MNP-CMR successfully tracked the evolution of myocardial inflammation in the same EAM rats. CONCLUSIONS: Magneto-fluorescent nanoparticle CMR permitted effective visualization of myocardial inflammatory cellular infiltrates and distinction of the extent of inflammation compared with conventional CMR in a preclinical model of EAM. Magneto-fluorescent nanoparticle CMR performs best in EAM rats with at least moderate inflammatory response.
Moon et al. (Wed,) conducted a other in Experimental autoimmune myocarditis (n=90). Magneto-fluorescent nanoparticle CMR vs. Conventional CMR was evaluated on Image contrast (CNR change) (p=<0.001). Magneto-fluorescent nanoparticle CMR provided better image contrast compared with conventional CMR (CNR change 46% vs 8%, P<0.001) for detecting myocardial inflammation in a rat model.