Abstract Rationale Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) and hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) are two distinct pulmonary vascular complications of liver disease. POPH is characterized by pulmonary hypertension and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance while HPS is characterized by intrapulmonary vasodilation and hypoxemia. POPH and HPS reflect opposing pulmonary vascular responses with markedly different therapeutic and transplant implications. Accurate distinction on imaging may aid clinical decision-making and risk stratification. We aimed to quantitatively characterize and compare chest CT imaging features of POPH and HPS compared to controls with isolated portal hypertension (PoH). Methods Three cohorts of HPS, POPH, and PoH were included (n = 5 per cohort). POPH patients with intrapulmonary vasodilation on contrast echocardiography were excluded. Contrast-enhanced chest CTs with slice thickness ≤ 1.5mm obtained closest to the time of diagnosis were selected (mean 2.7 years following diagnosis). CT images were analyzed using a deep learning algorithm developed in-house that segmented and computed volumes of central, interlobar, peripheral, upper peripheral, and lower peripheral pulmonary arteries (PAs); total, upper, and lower pulmonary veins (PVs); and the four cardiac chambers. Resulting volumes were indexed by body-surface area. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed with a post-hoc pairwise Mann-Whitney U test for comparison. Results Patients with HPS were 80% male, had a mean age of 48.6±17.4, and mean MELD-Na of 15.4±3.4. The POPH cohort was 20% male, had a mean age of 56.8±11.9, and mean MELD-Na of 13.4±4.0. The PoH cohort was 100% male, had a mean age of 62.8±4.8, and mean MELD-Na of 12.8±8.8. HPS patients had smaller central PA volumes (mean 26.4±1.8 mm2/m2) compared to both PoH (mean 38.6±9.8 mm2/m2, p = 0.03) and POPH patients (44.8±10.8 mm2/m2, p = 0.008). HPS patients, however, had larger lower peripheral PA (mean 30.7±1.9 mm2/m2) and PV (mean 28.3±6.7 mm2/m2) volumes compared to PoH (PAs mean 20.1±4.8 mm2/m2, p = 0.008; PVs mean 18.2±2.8 mm2/m2, p = 0.02) and larger lower peripheral PA volumes compared to POPH patients (PAs mean 22.1±5.1 mm2/m2, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in volumes between POPH and PoH for all segments. Conclusion Compared to PoH and POPH, HPS is associated with lower central PA volume and higher peripheral PA volume in the lower lungs. Volumes were similar between POPH and PoH; however, this may reflect limited statistical power given the small sample size. Larger studies are needed to further delineate imaging distinctions between POPH, HPS, and PoH. This abstract is funded by: NHLBI
Karanam et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: