The analytic solution for pulse wave propagation accurately modeled flow inside a patient-specific arterial tree, with maximum relative errors in pressure and flow rate never exceeding 1.6% and 9.0%.
A novel analytic solution for pulse wave propagation in flexible, tapered arteries accurately predicts pressure and flow rate, offering a computationally efficient alternative to 3D simulations.
In this paper, we present an analytic solution for pulse wave propagation in a flexible arterial model with tapering, physiological boundary conditions and variable wall properties (wall elasticity and thickness). The change of wall properties follows a profile that is proportional to r^α, where r represents the lumen radius and α is a material coefficient. The cross-sectionally averaged velocity and pressure are obtained by solving a hyperbolic system derived from the mass and momentum conservations, and they are expressed in Bessel functions of order (4-α) / (3-α) and 1/ (3-α), respectively. The solution is successfully validated by comparing it with numerical results from 3D fluid-structure interaction simulations. Subsequently, the solution is employed to study pulse wave propagation in an arterial model, revealing that the wall properties and the physiological outlet boundary conditions, such as the RCR model, play a crucial role in characterizing the input impedance and reflection coefficient. At low-frequency range, the input impedance is found to be insensitive to the wall properties and is primarily determined by the RCR parameters. At high-frequency range, the input impedance oscillates around the local characteristic impedance, and the oscillation amplitude varies non-monotonically with α. Expressions for the input impedance at both low-frequency and high-frequency limits are presented. This analytic solution is also successfully applied to model flow inside a patient-specific arterial tree, with the maximum relative errors in pressure and flow rate never exceeding 1. 6\% and 9. 0\% when compared to results from 3D numerical simulation.
Wu et al. (Fri,) conducted a other in Pulse wave propagation. Analytic solution for pulse wave propagation vs. 3D fluid-structure interaction simulations was evaluated on Maximum relative errors in pressure and flow rate. The analytic solution for pulse wave propagation accurately modeled flow inside a patient-specific arterial tree, with maximum relative errors in pressure and flow rate never exceeding 1.6% and 9.0%.