Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) is essential for healthcare trust, yet a substantial gap persists between XAI techniques and actual clinical adoption. This review addresses this gap by framing clinical integration through three complementary lenses. First, we introduce a three-dimensional XAI classification framework-property, dependency, and scope-that moves beyond descriptive cataloging and serves as a practical guide for matching XAI approaches to specific clinical tasks. Second, we propose an integrated evaluation system that balances technical robustness, including fidelity, with measures of clinical utility such as workflow alignment and clinician confidence. Third, we analyze the divergent and often competing needs of key stakeholder groups to produce a role-characteristic mapping that clarifies what constitutes meaningful explainability in different clinical contexts. By positioning clinical integration as the center, this review outlines a pathway for translating XAI from methodological innovation to a dependable component of clinical decision support.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kai Zhang
Harbin Institute of Technology
Dongqi Wang
Zhejiang Lab
Fuxin Lin
Zhejiang University
iScience
Zhejiang University
Harbin Institute of Technology
First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e1dd67a57fdc4e227aad0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115026
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: