Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
There is perhaps no more dan gerous force in social relations than the human mind. People's ca pacities to categorize, interpret, and go beyond the information given readily lead to the stereo typing and dehumanization that escalate and entrench group con flict. In this article, we focus on op posing partisans' tendency to exaggerate their opponents' ex tremism and the magnitude of their conflict. We first present re search documenting this bias, then consider how imagined extremism intensifies social conflicts, and conclude by discussing how parti sans with power judge their con flicts in more biased ways than do partisans without power, but are themselves judged more accu rately.
Keltner et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: